ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Participatory Impact Assessment×Theory-Based Impact Evaluation×
תחוםDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20142009
הוגה השיטהAndy Catley and colleagues, Feinstein International Center, Tufts UniversityCarol Weiss; Howard White (3ie)
סוגParticipatory project impact assessment methodEvaluation approach / framework
מקור מכונןCatley, A., Burns, J., Abebe, D., & Suji, O. (2014). Participatory Impact Assessment: A Design Guide. Somerville, MA: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University. link ↗White, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI ↗
כינוייםPIA, Participatory Impact Evaluation, Community-Based Impact Assessment, Participatory Impact MeasurementTheory of Change Evaluation, Contribution Analysis, Theory-Driven Evaluation, Causal-Chain Impact Evaluation
קשורות44
תקצירParticipatory Impact Assessment (PIA) is an approach to measuring the impact of development and humanitarian projects in which the affected communities define the indicators of change and use participatory tools to quantify it. Developed and codified by Andy Catley and colleagues at Tufts University's Feinstein International Center, largely through work on livestock and livelihoods programmes in pastoralist settings, PIA adapts participatory rural appraisal methods to the disciplined logic of impact evaluation — combining locally meaningful indicators with before-and-after and with-and-without comparisons to assess what a project actually changed.Theory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Participatory Impact Assessment · Theory-Based Impact Evaluation. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-25 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare