ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח סיכונים מתחרים רב-מרכזי×רגרסיית סיכונים יחסיים מרובי מרכזים×
תחוםאפידמיולוגיהאפידמיולוגיה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1999 (Fine-Gray); extended to multicenter settings throughout 2000s–2010s1972 (Cox model); multicenter applications formalized 1980s–1990s
הוגה השיטהFine & Gray (subdistribution hazard model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific hazard model)D. R. Cox (Cox PH model); multicenter extension developed through collaborative trial methodology
סוגSurvival / time-to-event statistical analysisSemi-parametric survival regression for clustered data
מקור מכונןFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗
כינוייםmulticenter CRA, multi-site competing risks, multicenter cumulative incidence analysis, polycentric competing risks studymulticenter Cox regression, multisite Cox PH model, stratified Cox model across centers, multicenter survival regression
קשורות44
תקצירMulticenter competing risks analysis is a time-to-event method applied across multiple clinical centers to estimate the probability of a specific event of interest when other mutually exclusive events — competing risks — can preclude its occurrence. By pooling data from diverse sites, it achieves the sample sizes needed to model rare events and enables assessment of center-level variation in cumulative incidence and covariate effects.Multicenter Cox proportional hazards regression extends the classic Cox PH model to studies conducted at two or more clinical sites or centers. It estimates the effect of predictors on time-to-event outcomes while explicitly accounting for clustering within centers, between-center heterogeneity, and potential differences in baseline hazard across sites. This design is standard practice in large multicenter RCTs and observational cohort studies in oncology, cardiology, and other clinical fields.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multicenter Competing Risks Analysis · Multicenter Cox proportional hazards. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare