השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תכנון מחקר אירועים רב-תקופתי× | הפרש-הפרשים דינמי× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | הסקה סיבתית | הסקה סיבתית |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1993 | 2021 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Jacobson, LaLonde & Sullivan (1993); seminal methodological treatment by Sun & Abraham (2021) | Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham |
| סוג≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Causal inference / quasi-experimental |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Jacobson, L. S., LaLonde, R. J., & Sullivan, D. G. (1993). Earnings losses of displaced workers. American Economic Review, 83(4), 888-909. link ↗ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | multi-period event study, dynamic event study, relative-time event study, leads-and-lags design | Dynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD |
| קשורות≠ | 3 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The multi-period event study design estimates causal treatment effects at each point in time relative to the treatment onset, using panel data with multiple pre- and post-treatment periods. By plotting the full path of treatment coefficients rather than a single average, it reveals how effects build up, fade, or remain stable over time — and allows formal tests of pre-treatment parallel trends across many periods simultaneously. | Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|