השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח מודולריות× | ניתוח דיפוזיה ברשת× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | ניתוח רשתות | ניתוח רשתות |
| משפחה | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2004 | 1927 (epidemic roots); network formalization 1990s–2000s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Newman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M. | Kermack, W. O. & McKendrick, A. G. |
| סוג≠ | Community detection / graph partitioning | Simulation / analytical model |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. DOI ↗ | Kermack, W. O. & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 115(772), 700–721. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | Q-modularity, community structure detection, network modularity optimization, graph partitioning by modularity | diffusion on networks, information diffusion, contagion spreading model, network propagation model |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Modularity analysis is a network science method, formalized by Newman and Girvan in 2004, that detects community structure in graphs by measuring whether edges are more concentrated within groups than expected by chance. Its scalar quality index Q guides algorithms that partition nodes into cohesive clusters, making it the most widely adopted framework for community detection in social, biological, and technological networks. | Network diffusion analysis models how information, diseases, behaviors, or innovations spread across a graph of nodes and edges. Drawing on classical epidemic theory (SI, SIR, SIS) and modern network science, it tracks which nodes become infected, how quickly, and whether the spread reaches a global cascade or dies out locally. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|