ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

הערכת מבחן סינון מותאם×ניתוח ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic)×
תחוםאפידמיולוגיהסטטיסטיקה
משפחהProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
שנת המקור1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)1954 (signal detection); 1982 (AUC formalization)
הוגה השיטהMethodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Peterson, Birdsall & Fox (signal detection theory); Hanley & McNeil (medical statistics)
סוגObservational diagnostic study with matched designDiagnostic accuracy evaluation
מקור מכונןPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. DOI ↗
כינוייםmatched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentROC curve analysis, AUC analysis, sensitivity-specificity analysis, diagnostic accuracy analysis
קשורות64
תקצירMatched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.ROC analysis evaluates how well a continuous or ordinal test variable discriminates between two binary outcome classes. By plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1 − specificity) across all decision thresholds, it produces a curve whose area under the curve (AUC) quantifies overall discriminative power, ranging from 0.5 (chance) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination).
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · ROC analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare