השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| משתנים אינסטרומנטליים (IV) במחקר חינוך× | אפקט הטיפול הממוצע המקומי (LATE / CACE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | הסקה סיבתית | הסקה סיבתית |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1991 (canonical education application) | 1994 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Angrist & Krueger (canonical 1991 education application); grounded in IV theory by Wright (1928) | Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996) |
| סוג≠ | Quasi-experimental causal identification | Instrumental-variable causal estimand |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 979-1014. DOI ↗ | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | IV in education, 2SLS in education, education IV, school IV estimation | LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE) |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Instrumental variables (IV) estimation is a quasi-experimental strategy for isolating the causal effect of schooling or educational interventions when assignment to treatment is confounded by unobserved factors. Pioneered in education economics by Angrist and Krueger's use of quarter-of-birth as an instrument for compulsory schooling, IV finds a source of exogenous variation in exposure to education and uses only that variation to estimate outcomes such as earnings, test scores, or attainment. | The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|