השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| אתנוגרפיה מוסדית× | פנומנולוגיה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | איכותני | איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1970s–1987 (developed through the 1970s–80s; consolidated in Smith 1987, 2005) | Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Dorothy E. Smith | Edmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic) |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative research approach |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466 |
| כינויים≠ | IE, sociology for people, institutional ethnographic inquiry, Smith's institutional ethnography | Fenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis |
| קשורות | 6 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Institutional Ethnography (IE) is a qualitative research method developed by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith that investigates how people's everyday lives are shaped and coordinated by institutional texts, rules, and relations of power. Starting from the lived experience of individuals in a particular standpoint, IE traces the social organization that governs their work and troubles — revealing how macro-level institutions operate through the micro-level activities of real people. | Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|