השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח שיח ביקורתי מבוסס-שדה× | אתנוגרפיה מוסדית× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | איכותני | איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1999–2001 | 1970s–1987 (developed through the 1970s–80s; consolidated in Smith 1987, 2005) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory) | Dorothy E. Smith |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative critical discourse framework | Qualitative research method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357 | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 |
| כינויים | Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis | IE, sociology for people, institutional ethnographic inquiry, Smith's institutional ethnography |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation. | Institutional Ethnography (IE) is a qualitative research method developed by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith that investigates how people's everyday lives are shaped and coordinated by institutional texts, rules, and relations of power. Starting from the lived experience of individuals in a particular standpoint, IE traces the social organization that governs their work and troubles — revealing how macro-level institutions operate through the micro-level activities of real people. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|