ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

שיטות מעורבות פרגמטיות מוכוונות הערכה×מחקר פעולה×
תחוםתכנון מחקרמחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1990s–2000s1946
הוגה השיטהJennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles TeddlieKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
סוגMixed methods research designMethod
מקור מכונןGreene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
כינוייםpragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluationParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
קשורות21
תקצירEvaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Evaluation-oriented Pragmatic Mixed Methods · Action Research. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare