ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח תוכניות לימודים×Thematic Analysis×
תחוםשיטות שדהמחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework)2006
הוגה השיטהGeorge J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
סוגQualitative / mixed document analysisMethod
מקור מכונןPosner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
כינוייםcurriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisalTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
קשורות63
תקצירCurriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Curriculum Analysis · Thematic Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare