השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מבחן A/B אקראי-מצברים× | ניסוי שדה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | תכנון ניסויים | תכנון ניסויים |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2010s (digital platforms); cluster RCT roots date to the 1970s–1980s | 1920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Developed from cluster randomized trial methodology; popularized in digital experimentation by researchers at Facebook, LinkedIn, and Microsoft Research (2010s) | Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004) |
| סוג | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2013). Graph cluster randomization: Network exposure to multiple universes. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 329–337. DOI ↗ | Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | cluster A/B test, group-randomized A/B test, network A/B test, cluster-level split test | field trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | A cluster randomized A/B test is an experimental design in which intact groups (clusters) — such as cities, schools, social network communities, or app user segments — are randomly assigned as whole units to either the treatment (A) or control (B) condition, rather than randomizing individual users or subjects. This approach is used when treatment effects would spill over between individuals if individual-level randomization were applied, or when the intervention must be delivered at the group level. | A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|