השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מחקר פעולה× | מחקר מבוסס-תכנון× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | מחקר איכותני | שיטות שדה |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1946 | 1992 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury | Ann L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992) |
| סוג≠ | Method | Interventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ | Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry | DBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research |
| קשורות≠ | 1 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. | Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|