השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| סולם היושרה האקדמית× | שאלון להערכת מיומנויות למידה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכולוגיה חינוכית | פסיכולוגיה חינוכית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2000s | 1964 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Various authors; instrument varies by version | Brown, W.F.; Holtzman, W.H. |
| סוג | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Cizek, G. J. (2003). Detecting and preventing classroom cheating: Practical strategies for teachers and professors. Corwin Press. link ↗ | Brown, W. F., & Holtzman, W. H. (1964). Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes (SSHA). Psychological Corporation. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | AIS | SSAQ, Study Habits and Attitudes Test |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | The Academic Integrity Scale measures students' attitudes, values, and likelihood of engaging in academic dishonesty including cheating, plagiarism, and unauthorized collaboration. Multiple validated versions exist, each assessing different facets of academic integrity such as personal integrity commitment, perceived cheating prevalence, institutional support for honesty, and personal susceptibility to cheating. This instrument is essential for understanding integrity culture in educational settings and evaluating interventions promoting academic honesty. | The Study Skills Assessment Questionnaire measures the habitual study practices, time management, concentration, and learning motivation of students. Originating from the foundational Survey of Study Habits and Attitudes (Brown & Holtzman, 1964) and refined in contemporary versions, the SSAQ identifies whether students employ evidence-based study techniques (spaced practice, self-testing, active recall) or ineffective strategies (cramming, passive rereading). This information is invaluable for academic support professionals designing skill-building interventions tailored to student needs. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|