ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Échantillonnage systématique pondéré×Échantillonnage pondéré×
DomaineMéthodologie d'enquêteMéthodologie d'enquête
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineMid-20th century (1950s-1970s)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
Auteur d'origineWilliam G. Cochran (systematic and weighted probability sampling theory)Morris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TypeProbability sampling techniqueProbability sampling design
Source fondatriceCochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471162407Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Aliassystematic sampling with weights, probability-weighted systematic sampling, systematic PPS samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Apparentées56
RésuméWeighted systematic sampling selects units at equal spacing along a cumulative-weight axis rather than along a simple list index. By ordering the population and accumulating auxiliary size or importance weights before applying a fixed sampling interval, it combines the operational simplicity of systematic sampling with the efficiency gains of probability-proportional-to-size selection — giving larger or more important units a higher probability of inclusion while still visiting every part of the ordered frame.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Weighted Systematic Sampling · Weighted Sampling. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare