ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de modularité pondérée×Centralité d'intermédiarité×
DomaineAnalyse de réseauxAnalyse de réseaux
FamilleMachine learningMachine learning
Année d'origine20041977
Auteur d'origineNewman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TypeCommunity structure optimization on weighted graphsCentrality measure
Source fondatriceNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Aliasweighted modularity, weighted Q optimization, weighted network community detection, strength-based modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Apparentées56
RésuméWeighted modularity analysis extends the classical Newman-Girvan modularity measure to networks where edges carry numeric strengths (frequencies, intensities, costs). By replacing binary adjacency with tie weights, it finds community partitions that reflect how densely interconnected subgroups are relative to what is expected under a weighted null model, yielding more nuanced groupings than unweighted approaches on data where edge strength varies meaningfully.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Weighted Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare