ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

F1 pondéré×F1-score moyenné par micro-classe×
DomaineÉvaluation de modèlesÉvaluation de modèles
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine2000s2000s
Auteur d'origineMulti-class evaluation communityMulti-class evaluation community
TypeEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
Source fondatricePowers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗
AliasSupport-weighted F1Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1
Apparentées34
RésuméWeighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging.Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Weighted F1 · Micro-averaged F1. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare