ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Web Controversy Analysis×Controversy Mapping×
DomaineScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine20122010
Auteur d'origineTommaso Venturini, Noortje MarresBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
TypeWeb-native controversy research methodQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
Source fondatriceVenturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI ↗Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
AliasWeb controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartographyCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Apparentées44
RésuméWeb controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Web Controversy Analysis · Controversy Mapping. Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare