Comparer des méthodes

	Ensemble par vote	Boosting
Domaine	Apprentissage automatique	Apprentissage automatique
Famille	Machine learning	Machine learning
Année d'origine	1990s–2004	1990–1997
Auteur d'origine	Lam & Suen; Kuncheva, L. I. (systematic treatment)	Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.
Type	Ensemble (combination of multiple classifiers by vote)	Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting)
Source fondatrice	Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0-471-21078-8	Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.
Alias	majority voting classifier, hard voting, soft voting ensemble, plurality voting ensemble	AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble
Apparentées	5	6
Résumé	A voting ensemble trains several diverse classifiers independently and combines their predictions by a vote: hard voting picks the class chosen by the most models, while soft voting averages their class-probability estimates, optionally with per-model weights. The combination usually outperforms any individual member, and requires no additional training after the base models are fitted.	Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy.