ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Échelle Visuelle Analogique pour la Douleur×Échelle de Coma de Glasgow×L'échelle numérique d'évaluation de la douleur×
DomaineÉvaluation cliniqueÉvaluation cliniqueServices de santé
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine197419741986
Auteur d'origineE. Carl HuskissonGraham Teasdale and Bryan JennettMark P. Jensen and colleagues
TypePain intensity measurementConsciousness and neurological assessmentUnidimensional pain severity measurement
Source fondatriceHuskisson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2(7889), 1127-1131. DOI ↗Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81-84. DOI ↗Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain, 27(3), 297-307. DOI ↗
AliasVAS, Pain VAS, Visual Rating ScaleGCS, Glasgow ScaleNRS, NRS-11, NRS-101
Apparentées222
RésuméThe Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10-centimeter line for measuring pain intensity, developed by Huskisson in 1974. Patients mark their current pain level along the continuum from no pain to worst pain imaginable. It remains one of the most widely used single-item pain measures in clinical practice and research.The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), developed by Teasdale and Jennett in 1974, is a 15-point scale used to assess level of consciousness and severity of brain injury. It evaluates eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, making it the gold standard tool for rapid neurological assessment in trauma, emergency, and intensive care settings.The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a single-item, self-report measure of pain intensity developed by Jensen and colleagues in 1986. Patients rate their pain on an 11-point scale (0-10) where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The NRS is among the most widely used pain severity measures in clinical practice and research due to its simplicity, rapid administration, and robust measurement properties.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Visual Analog Scale for Pain · Glasgow Coma Scale · Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare