Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Conception du protocole de vaccination× | Systèmes de notation clinique en médecine vétérinaire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Médecine vétérinaire | Médecine vétérinaire |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1990s-2000s | 2000s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) | Veterinary Pain Society and AAFP |
| Type≠ | Clinical protocol pipeline | Assessment pipeline |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Day, M. J., Horzinek, M. C., Schultz, R. D., Squires, R. A. (2016). WSAVA Guidelines for the vaccination of dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 57(4), E1-E45. DOI ↗ | Hansen, B. D., Lascelles, B. D., Keates, H., et al. (2015). Painful Osteoarthritis in Cats: Chronic Pain Assessment, Management, and Welfare Considerations. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 17(8), 637-646. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | immunization protocol, vaccine scheduling, vaccination planning | clinical assessment scoring, veterinary patient scoring |
| Apparentées | 3 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Vaccination protocol design is a systematic approach to planning and administering immunizations in animals to prevent infectious disease. Formalized by organizations such as the World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) from the 1990s onward, evidence-based protocols balance disease risk, individual animal factors, vaccine efficacy, duration of immunity, and regulatory requirements to optimize herd and individual protection. | Clinical scoring systems provide standardized methods for objectively assessing animal health status, pain, disease severity, and treatment outcomes. Developed progressively by veterinary organizations and research groups since the early 2000s, these systems enable consistent documentation, comparison of cases, and evidence-based clinical decision-making across species and practice settings. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|