Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| UTA*× | Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1985 | 1980 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|