Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Détection de similarité Turnitin et iThenticate× | Plagiat textuel× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Éthique de la recherche | Éthique de la recherche |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1997 | 1950s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Turnitin (1997), iThenticate (commercial variant) | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) |
| Type≠ | Tool | Concept |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Turnitin. (2023). Turnitin similarity detection and plagiarism detection technology. Retrieved from https://www.turnitin.com/products/similarity link ↗ | Council of Canadian Academies (2019). The state of science and technology in Canada. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | text-matching software, plagiarism detection software, similarity detection, originality reports | direct plagiarism, copy-and-paste plagiarism, literal copying |
| Apparentées≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Turnitin and iThenticate are commercial text-matching software tools used by educational institutions and academic journals to screen submissions for potential plagiarism. Turnitin is designed for student assignments; iThenticate is designed for researcher manuscripts. Both tools compare submitted text against billions of sources (web pages, academic databases, previously submitted documents) and generate a Similarity Index showing what percentage of the submission matches existing sources. These tools are screening instruments, not plagiarism detectors—they flag suspicious content for human review. | Verbatim plagiarism is the most straightforward and recognizable form of academic misconduct: copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation marks, citation, or attribution. It is the most easily detected form of plagiarism and carries severe institutional and career consequences. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|