Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Phénoménologie transcendantale× | Analyse du discours× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Qualitatif | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1900–1913 (Ideas I, 1913) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Edmund Husserl | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Husserlian phenomenology, eidetic phenomenology, transcendental-phenomenological research, pure phenomenology | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Résumé≠ | Transcendental phenomenology, founded by Edmund Husserl, is a qualitative method that seeks the universal essential structures — the invariant essences — of a consciously lived experience. By bracketing all assumptions and prior theories (epoché) and applying eidetic reduction, the researcher uncovers what an experience is in its purest, most fundamental form, independent of any particular context, culture, or individual biography. Clark Moustakas's 1994 adaptation made the method directly accessible to social-science researchers. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|