Comparer des méthodes

	Couplage bibliographique par tranches temporelles	Analyse de co-citation
Domaine	Scientométrie	Bibliométrie
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1963 (base method); time-sliced variant widely adopted 1990s–2000s	1973
Auteur d'origine	Morton M. Kessler (bibliographic coupling); time-sliced extension by various scientometricians	Henry Small
Type	Longitudinal bibliometric network analysis	Method
Source fondatrice	Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.	Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Alias	longitudinal bibliographic coupling, temporal bibliographic coupling, diachronic bibliographic coupling, time-window bibliographic coupling	co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	Time-sliced bibliographic coupling divides a publication corpus into successive time windows and applies bibliographic coupling analysis within each window to track how research fronts emerge, shift, merge, or disappear across time. It transforms a static snapshot technique into a longitudinal tool for mapping the intellectual evolution of a scientific field, revealing when and how new thematic clusters appear in the literature.	Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.