ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Estimation ciblée du maximum de vraisemblance (TMLE)×Apprentissage automatique double×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleMachine learningMachine learning
Année d'origine20062018
Auteur d'origineMark van der Laan & Daniel RubinVictor Chernozhukov et al.
TypeSemiparametric estimatorSemiparametric causal estimation
Source fondatricevan der Laan, M. J., & Rubin, D. (2006). Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2(1). DOI ↗Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1–C68. DOI ↗
AliasTargeted Learning, TMLE, Targeted MLE, Hedeflenmiş Maksimum Olabilirlik TahminiDebiased Machine Learning, Neyman Orthogonal Score Estimation, Partialing-Out Lasso, Çift Makine Öğrenmesi
Apparentées33
RésuméTargeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) is a semiparametric, doubly robust causal inference method introduced by Mark van der Laan and Daniel Rubin in 2006. It combines flexible machine learning models for both the outcome and the treatment assignment mechanism, then applies a targeting step that re-fits the initial outcome model specifically to reduce bias for a pre-specified causal estimand such as the average treatment effect. TMLE is widely used in epidemiology, biostatistics, and health economics when estimating causal effects from observational data.Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML), introduced by Chernozhukov et al. (2018), is a semiparametric framework for estimating causal or structural parameters in the presence of high-dimensional controls. It uses flexible machine learning methods to model nuisance functions—the conditional expectations of the outcome and the treatment given covariates—and then constructs a debiased estimator of the target parameter that achieves root-n consistency and valid inference despite the regularization bias inherent in high-dimensional settings.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation · Double Machine Learning. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare