ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Swing Weighting×Évaluation du rapport additif×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19862010
Auteur d'originevon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeWeight_Subjective (swing from worst to best, relative gain assessment)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Source fondatricevon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press ISBN: 978-0521271073Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméSWING (Swing Weighting — importance weights derived from worst-to-best swing utility gains) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: SWING · ARAS. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare