ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse statique de code×Métriques de complexité logicielle×
DomaineGénie logicielGénie logiciel
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine20011976
Auteur d'origineDavid Engler and William PughThomas J. McCabe
Typeautomated analysisquantitative measurement
Source fondatriceChess, B., & West, J. (2007). Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. link ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
Aliasstatic analysis, code inspection, automated reviewcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
Apparentées44
RésuméStatic code analysis automatically examines source code without execution, detecting potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, and style violations. Pioneered by Engler and Pugh (2001), automated analysis tools scan codebases at scale, identifying defect patterns faster than manual review. Organizations integrate static analysis into continuous integration pipelines to prevent defects early.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Download slides

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Static Code Analysis · Software Complexity Metrics. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare