Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Appariement par Score de Propension Spatiale× | Appariement par score de propension× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Inférence causale | Statistiques de recherche |
| Famille≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2000s | 1983 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Type≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Spatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|