Comparer des méthodes

	Pondération par l'Inverse de la Probabilité Spatiale (Spatial IPW)	Pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement (IPW / IPTW)
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	2010s	2000
Auteur d'origine	Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) IPW to spatial settings; formal treatment by Papadogeorgou et al. (2019)	Robins, Hernán & Brumback
Type	Quasi-experimental / causal inference	Causal inference weighting estimator
Source fondatrice	Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189.	Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560.
Alias	Spatial IPW, Geographic IPW, Spatially-weighted IPW, SIPW	IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	Spatial Inverse Probability Weighting extends the classical IPW estimator to settings where units are geo-referenced and spatial location is a confounding dimension. By incorporating geographic coordinates or spatial proximity into the propensity score model, it reweights the observed sample so that treatment and control groups are balanced not only on measured covariates but also on spatial structure, enabling credible causal inference from spatially indexed observational data.	Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.