Comparer des méthodes

	Équilibrage entropique spatial	Pondération par l'Inverse de la Probabilité Spatiale (Spatial IPW)
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	2010s	2010s
Auteur d'origine	Extension of Hainmueller (2012) entropy balancing to spatial settings; spatial adaptations developed in geographic epidemiology and spatial econometrics literature	Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) IPW to spatial settings; formal treatment by Papadogeorgou et al. (2019)
Type	Quasi-experimental reweighting	Quasi-experimental / causal inference
Source fondatrice	Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46.	Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189.
Alias	spatial EB, geographically-weighted entropy balancing, spatial reweighting	Spatial IPW, Geographic IPW, Spatially-weighted IPW, SIPW
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Spatial entropy balancing extends standard entropy balancing to observational settings where units are embedded in geographic space, incorporating spatial structure into the reweighting process so that balance is achieved while respecting spatial proximity, clustering, or spillover dependencies between units.	Spatial Inverse Probability Weighting extends the classical IPW estimator to settings where units are geo-referenced and spatial location is a confounding dimension. By incorporating geographic coordinates or spatial proximity into the propensity score model, it reweights the observed sample so that treatment and control groups are balanced not only on measured covariates but also on spatial structure, enabling credible causal inference from spatially indexed observational data.