ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Métriques de complexité logicielle×Analyse statique de code×
DomaineGénie logicielGénie logiciel
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19762001
Auteur d'origineThomas J. McCabeDavid Engler and William Pugh
Typequantitative measurementautomated analysis
Source fondatriceMcCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗Chess, B., & West, J. (2007). Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. link ↗
Aliascode complexity analysis, complexity measurementstatic analysis, code inspection, automated review
Apparentées44
RésuméSoftware complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.Static code analysis automatically examines source code without execution, detecting potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, and style violations. Pioneered by Engler and Pugh (2001), automated analysis tools scan codebases at scale, identifying defect patterns faster than manual review. Organizations integrate static analysis into continuous integration pipelines to prevent defects early.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Download slides

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Software Complexity Metrics · Static Code Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare