ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Social Shaping of Technology×Social Construction of Technology×
DomaineScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19851984
Auteur d'origineDonald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David EdgeTrevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker
TypeAnalytic tradition and method in the sociology of technologyConstructivist theory of technological development
Source fondatriceMacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗
AliasSST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology frameworkSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis
Apparentées44
RésuméThe Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise.The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Social Shaping of Technology · Social Construction of Technology. Consulté le 2026-06-25 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare