Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Conception expérimentale à pré-test et post-test en aveugle simple× | Conception expérimentale avec groupe témoin× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Plans d'expériences | Plans d'expériences |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1963 (systematic codification); blinding in use from early 20th century | 1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Campbell & Stanley (codified); blinding practice has earlier roots in clinical research | Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley |
| Type≠ | Controlled experimental design with partial blinding | Experimental research design |
| Source fondatrice | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗ |
| Alias | single-masked pretest-posttest design, participant-blind pretest-posttest, single-blind before-after design, SB-PP design | controlled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The single-blind pretest-posttest experimental design combines two protective strategies: measuring outcomes both before and after treatment to quantify change, and keeping participants unaware of which condition they are in. This pairing controls for preexisting group differences and expectancy-driven response bias, making it a practical middle ground between fully open-label and double-blind trials in behavioral and health research. | Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|