Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité de contenu des formes abrégées× | Validité discriminante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1995–2000 | 1959 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|