Comparer des méthodes

	Analyse de Sensibilité avec le Déploiement de la Fonction Qualité	Analyse de sensibilité
Domaine	Plans d'expériences	Prise de décision
Famille	Process / pipeline	MCDM
Année d'origine	1990s–2000s (integration period)	2004
Auteur d'origine	Yoji Akao (QFD foundation); sensitivity extension attributed to multiple QFD researchers (1990s–2000s)	Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M.
Type	Integrated engineering design and decision analysis technique	Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices
Source fondatrice	Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2006). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2483–2504.	Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester
Alias	SA-QFD, QFD sensitivity analysis, robust QFD, House of Quality sensitivity analysis	—
Apparentées	2	0
Résumé	Sensitivity analysis integrated with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) tests how stable the prioritization of engineering characteristics remains when customer requirement weights or relationship matrix scores are varied. By systematically perturbing the inputs of the House of Quality, teams identify which design parameters are truly critical and which rankings would flip under different assumptions — turning QFD from a one-shot prioritization tool into a robust decision framework.	SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.