Comparer des méthodes

	Analyse de sensibilité au biais caché (Bornes de Rosenbaum / E-value)	Tests placebo pour l'inférence causale
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	2002	2010
Auteur d'origine	Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)	Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (synthetic control placebos); Imbens & Lemieux (RDD validity)
Type	Sensitivity analysis for causal inference	Falsification / robustness test family for causal inference
Source fondatrice	Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679	Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505.
Alias	Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity	falsification tests, placebo checks, refutation tests, Plasebo Testleri — Nedensel Çıkarım Doğrulama
Apparentées	5	5
Résumé	Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).	Placebo tests are a family of falsification checks that probe the credibility of a causal claim by re-running the analysis on a fake treatment, a false intervention date, or an outcome that should not have been affected. The approach was popularised through the synthetic control work of Abadie, Diamond and Hainmueller (2010) and the regression-discontinuity validity checks of Imbens and Lemieux (2008).