ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Rough-TOPSIS×Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20132010
Auteur d'origineSong, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeRough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Source fondatriceSong, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: ROUGH-TOPSIS · CCSD. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare