Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Rough-TODIM× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2024 | 1996 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Tiwari, V. Khanna, P. Tandon, P. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Tiwari, V., Khanna, P., Tandon, P. (2024). Capturing Design Intent During Concept Evaluation Using Rough Numbers and TODIM Method. Computer-Aided Design & Applications DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | ROUGH-TODIM (Rough-TODIM — Rough extension of TODIM) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Tiwari, V. Khanna, P. Tandon, P. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|