ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Recuit simulé robuste×Algorithme Génétique Robuste×
DomaineSimulationSimulation
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1983 (SA); robust variant emerged 1990s–2000s2005 (systematic survey); earlier applications from late 1990s
Auteur d'origineKirkpatrick, Gelatt & Vecchi (SA basis); robust formulation developed across the operations research communityJin, Y. and Branke, J. (systematic formalization); roots in Holland (1975)
TypeMetaheuristic with robustness evaluationMetaheuristic evolutionary optimizer with robustness mechanism
Source fondatriceKirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680. DOI ↗Jin, Y., Branke, J. (2005). Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments — a survey. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9(3), 303–317. DOI ↗
AliasRSA, Robust SA, Uncertainty-robust simulated annealing, Worst-case simulated annealingRGA, Robust GA, Uncertainty-Aware Genetic Algorithm, Noise-Tolerant Genetic Algorithm
Apparentées56
RésuméRobust Simulated Annealing (RSA) adapts the classical simulated annealing metaheuristic to seek solutions that perform well not just under nominal conditions but across the full range of uncertain or adversarial parameter values. By embedding a robustness evaluation — worst-case, expected-case, or regret-based — into the SA acceptance step, RSA trades some nominal optimality for resilience, making it valuable when problem parameters are imprecisely known or subject to environmental variation.The Robust Genetic Algorithm (RGA) extends standard genetic algorithms to find solutions that perform well not only at the nominal design point but also when subjected to uncertainty in decision variables, parameters, or fitness evaluations. By incorporating explicit robustness measures into selection pressure, RGA balances optimality against sensitivity to perturbation, making it suitable for engineering design, scheduling, and policy optimization under real-world variability.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Robust Simulated Annealing · Robust Genetic Algorithm. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare