ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Appariement Robuste par Score de Propension×Pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement (IPW / IPTW)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)2000
Auteur d'origineAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRobins, Hernán & Brumback
TypeQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
Source fondatriceAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
Aliasrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferenceIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Apparentées65
RésuméRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare