Comparer des méthodes

	SVM à une classe robuste	Machine à vecteurs de support robuste
Domaine	Apprentissage automatique	Apprentissage automatique
Famille	Machine learning	Machine learning
Année d'origine	2000s–2010s	2006–2009
Auteur d'origine	Extensions of Scholkopf et al. (1999); robust variants developed in 2000s–2010s	Xu, H., Caramanis, C., & Mannor, S.
Type	Anomaly detection / novelty detection	Robust supervised classifier / regressor
Source fondatrice	Scholkopf, B., Williamson, R., Smola, A., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Platt, J. (1999). Support vector method for novelty detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 12, 582–588.	Xu, H., Caramanis, C., & Mannor, S. (2009). Robustness and regularization of support vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 1485–1510.
Alias	Robust OCSVM, Outlier-robust One-Class SVM, Contamination-tolerant OCSVM, Robust novelty detection SVM	Robust SVM, RSVM, noise-tolerant SVM, outlier-robust SVM
Apparentées	5	5
Résumé	Robust One-Class SVM extends the classic One-Class Support Vector Machine for novelty and anomaly detection by incorporating robustness mechanisms — such as trimmed objectives, robust kernel choices, or contamination-tolerant loss functions — that reduce the influence of heavy-tailed noise or outliers present in the training data, yielding a decision boundary that better represents the true support of the normal class.	Robust SVM extends the standard support vector machine to resist the influence of outliers and mislabeled points. By replacing the hinge loss with a bounded or non-convex loss function — or by incorporating robust optimization constraints — it learns a decision boundary that is far less distorted by corrupted training examples, making it suitable for noisy real-world datasets where standard SVM would degrade significantly.