ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation robuste de la validité de contenu×Validité convergente×
DomainePsychométriePsychométrie
FamilleLatent structureLatent structure
Année d'origine1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions)1959
Auteur d'origineGrounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics traditionDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
TypeValidity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregationValidity evidence / construct validation
Source fondatriceLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliasrobust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validationconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Apparentées64
RésuméRobust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Robust Content Validity · Convergent Validity. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare