ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Risk-based Response Surface Methodology×Méthodologie Robuste de Surfaces de Réponse×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1990s–2000s (risk-based extensions)1990
Auteur d'origineBuilds on Box & Wilson (1951) RSM; risk integration formalized in engineering reliability literature from the 1990s onwardG. G. Vining and Raymond H. Myers (dual response formulation)
TypeExperimental optimization with probabilistic risk constraintsExperimental optimization technique
Source fondatriceMyers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470174463Vining, G. G., & Myers, R. H. (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22(1), 38–45. DOI ↗
AliasRisk-based RSM, reliability-based RSM, probabilistic RSM, risk-integrated response surface methodologyRobust RSM, dual response surface methodology, robust parameter design via RSM, mean-variance RSM
Apparentées53
RésuméRisk-based Response Surface Methodology (Risk-based RSM) extends classical RSM by embedding probabilistic risk or reliability constraints into the experimental optimization process. Rather than seeking a single optimal point under deterministic conditions, it identifies factor settings that achieve performance goals while keeping the probability of failure or unacceptable outcomes below a specified threshold — making it especially valuable in safety-critical and high-variability engineering contexts.Robust Response Surface Methodology (Robust RSM) is an experimental optimization strategy that simultaneously fits two regression models — one for the mean response and one for its variance (or standard deviation) — across a designed experiment. By jointly optimizing these dual surfaces, engineers identify factor settings that hit a performance target while minimizing process variability, combining the empirical model-building power of classical RSM with the variance-reduction goals of robust parameter design.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Risk-based Response Surface Methodology · Robust Response Surface Methodology. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare