Comparer des méthodes

	Resilience Measurement for Development	Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
Domaine	Development Studies	Development Studies
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2016	1998
Auteur d'origine	FAO (RIMA); Christophe Béné and colleagues (conceptual framing)	Robert Chambers & Gordon Conway; Ian Scoones; DFID
Type	Latent-variable framework for measuring development resilience	Analytical framework for understanding livelihoods and poverty
Source fondatrice	FAO (2016). RIMA-II: Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis-II. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.	Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
Alias	RIMA, Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis, Resilience Capacity Index, Development Resilience Measurement	SLF, Sustainable Livelihoods Approach, SLA, DFID Livelihoods Framework
Apparentées	4	4
Résumé	Resilience Measurement and Analysis is a family of methods for quantifying the ability of households and communities to withstand, recover from, and adapt to shocks and stresses while maintaining or improving their well-being, especially food security. Exemplified by the FAO's Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis (RIMA-II) and informed by Béné and colleagues' critical conceptual work, it treats resilience as a latent capacity inferred from observable assets, access to services, and adaptive behaviours, estimated statistically and tracked over time to inform and evaluate resilience-building interventions.	The Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) is an analytical lens for understanding how poor households construct their livelihoods, drawing on five categories of capital assets within a vulnerability context that is mediated by institutions and policies. Crystallised by Robert Chambers and Gordon Conway and operationalised by Ian Scoones and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) in the late 1990s, it shifts development analysis from sector-by-sector or income-only views to a holistic, people-centred account of what people have, what they do with it, and what outcomes result.