ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Reliable Change Index×Routine Outcome Monitoring×
DomaineSocial WorkSocial Work
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19912001
Auteur d'origineNeil S. Jacobson & Paula TruaxMichael J. Lambert and the patient-focused/measurement-based-care tradition
TypeStatistical index of whether an individual client's change exceeds measurement errorSystematic repeated measurement of client outcomes to inform ongoing care
Source fondatriceJacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Client-focused research: Using client outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 159–172. DOI ↗
AliasRCI, Reliable Change Index (Jacobson-Truax), Jacobson-Truax Reliable Change, Reliable Change CriterionROM, Measurement-Based Care, Outcome Monitoring, Progress Monitoring
Apparentées44
RésuméThe Reliable Change Index (RCI) is a statistic that tells whether the change in an individual client's score on a measure, from before to after an intervention, is large enough that it is unlikely to be an artifact of the instrument's measurement error. Introduced by Neil Jacobson and Paula Truax in 1991 as one half of their two-part definition of clinically significant change, it converts a pre-post difference into a standardized value and compares it against a critical cutoff, typically 1.96, so that practitioners and researchers can classify each client as reliably improved, unchanged, or reliably deteriorated.Routine outcome monitoring (ROM), also called measurement-based care, is the practice of repeatedly administering a validated outcome measure throughout a course of treatment and using the resulting data to track each client's progress, compare it against an expected recovery trajectory, and adjust care when a client is not improving as predicted. Pioneered in psychotherapy by Michael Lambert's patient-focused research and now standard in behavioral health and social work, it turns outcome measurement from a one-time research activity into a continuous clinical feedback loop that demonstrably improves outcomes for clients who would otherwise deteriorate.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Reliable Change Index · Routine Outcome Monitoring. Consulté le 2026-06-25 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare