Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Rappel (Sensibilité)× | Précision× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Évaluation de modèles | Évaluation de modèles |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine | 20th century | 20th century |
| Auteur d'origine | Historical statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations |
| Type | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Source fondatrice | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR | Positive Predictive Value, PPV |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. | Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|