ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Comptage Rainflow×Méthode de Fiabilité du Premier Ordre (FORM)×
DomaineIngénierie de la fiabilitéIngénierie de la fiabilité
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19741969
Auteur d'origineTatsuo EndoAllin Cornell
TypeCycle counting algorithmReliability analysis method
Source fondatriceGoodman, J. (1899). Mechanics Applied to Engineering. Longman, Green and Co. link ↗Cornell, C. A. (1969). A probability-based structural code. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 66(12), 974-985. DOI ↗
AliasRainflow cycle counting, RFCFORM, First-order second-moment method
Apparentées44
RésuméRainflow counting is a fatigue cycle counting method that converts a complex stress history into individual cycles for damage assessment. Developed by Tatsuo Endo and colleagues in 1974, it provides the most physically realistic representation of fatigue damage when combined with Miner's linear cumulative damage hypothesis. The algorithm has become the industry standard in reliability engineering and vibration analysis.The First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) is a probabilistic technique for estimating the probability of structural failure given uncertain input parameters. Developed by Allin Cornell in 1969 and refined by Hasofer and Lind in 1974, FORM provides a computationally efficient approximation to the true failure probability by linearizing the limit-state function at the most probable failure point. It has become the cornerstone of modern structural reliability analysis and risk-based design.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Rainflow Counting · First-Order Reliability Method. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare