ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Schéma de méthodes mixtes à priorité quantitative×Conception pragmatique de la méthodologie mixte×
DomaineConception de la rechercheConception de la recherche
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2003–2009Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
Auteur d'origineCreswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & TashakkoriJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
TypeMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Source fondatriceCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
AliasQUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methodspragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Apparentées66
RésuméQuantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Quantitative-priority mixed methods design · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare