Comparer des méthodes

	Schéma de devis méthodologique mixte transformateur à dominante qualitative	Conception transformative par méthodes mixtes
Domaine	Conception de la recherche	Conception de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2003–2010	2003–2009
Auteur d'origine	Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology)	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Source fondatrice	Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Alias	QUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.