Comparer des méthodes

	Schéma de devis méthodologique mixte transformateur à dominante qualitative	Schéma de devis méthodologique mixte à triangulation concurrente
Domaine	Conception de la recherche	Conception de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2003–2010	2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.)
Auteur d'origine	Donna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology)	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Source fondatrice	Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179
Alias	QUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority	convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals.	The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions.